Skip to content
logo TNQ
  • Read
    • Dispatches
    • Issues
    • Online Exclusives
    • Free Archive
      • Poetry
      • Fiction
      • Nonfiction
  • TNQ Presents
    • Spirit Ink
    • The Wild Writers Literary Festival
    • The X Page Workshop
    • Parallel Careers
  • Subscribe
    • Print Magazine
    • Digital Edition
    • Free Archive
  • Submit
    • Contests
    • Regular Submissions
  • Donate
  • Buy
  • About
    • About TNQ
    • Where to Buy
    • Contact Us
  • My Account
  • Read
    • Dispatches
    • Issues
    • Online Exclusives
    • Free Archive
      • Poetry
      • Fiction
      • Nonfiction
  • TNQ Presents
    • Spirit Ink
    • The Wild Writers Literary Festival
    • The X Page Workshop
    • Parallel Careers
  • Subscribe
    • Print Magazine
    • Digital Edition
    • Free Archive
  • Submit
    • Contests
    • Regular Submissions
  • Donate
  • Buy
  • About
    • About TNQ
    • Where to Buy
    • Contact Us
  • My Account
Login
$0.00 0 Cart

Month: November 2016

Retreating

Laura Rock’s fiction, essays, and book reviews have appeared in The New Quarterly, U of T magazine (online), The Antigonish Review, Southword, and other journals and anthologies. She is grateful to The New Quarterly for sponsoring her stay at the 2016 Write on the French River Retreat.

Canoe on the French River

Alone in my cottage at the Lodge at Pine Cove, I have time to read. Someone has thoughtfully left a back copy of The New Quarterly (TNQ) on the nightstand. I flip through the pages without hurrying. What a luxury it is to read in an undirected way: free to encounter sensibility and style, lines of argument, offerings. For the five nights of the Write on the French River Creative Writing Retreat, after the social hour and dinner, I pour wine, sit in the comfy rocking chair, and sample words—an Ayelet Tsabari essay I had meant to read when it first appeared in TNQ; the freshly published story of a new friend a few cottages over; a clutch of books written by the retreat instructors; and my own unruly notes and manuscript pages piled on the kitchen table.

The messy table cheers me, because it looks like my work. There’s no need to clean this table, no meals to cook and serve. The kitchen is stocked with supplies, but I don’t use them beyond firing the kettle for tea. In the space between the table and sink, there’s room to lay out a yoga mat. The floor, painted a vibrant spring green, is as inviting as the rocking chair, as conducive to thinking.

View from the Cabin

My cottage is a capsule of peace sheltered by trees. I stay up late, listening to the water murmur to the rocky shore just beyond the window. Lying in bed before falling asleep, I track the changeable sky through a frame of white pines, a view so Tom Thomson it made me laugh at first. Unreal, I thought. How can this be real?

Mornings, I wake before the alarm rings, which never happens in normal life. I have time to write first thing—longhand, on the computer, both—before heading to the lodge for the day’s activities. When one is on retreat, the hours expand. The anxiety of continually rushing recedes.

Breakfast arrives in a picnic basket left on the doorstep. This meal—a feast that tastes especially sweet since I didn’t have to prepare it—is best taken in the cabin’s screened porch, staring at the blue expanse of Wolseley Bay. I savour the contents of the basket, which will vanish later, along with the dirty dishes. Magic like that never happens at home.

I’m alone in this cottage by request. Quiet alone-time is an epic gift. But so is the intriguing Write on the French River program, so every morning I ditch solitude for society, knowing I can return to the cottage at will. I join the other retreaters as we make our way along a winding path fragrant with pine needles and damp earth toward a long wooden bridge spanning Pine Cove and then on to the lodge. We cross the fairy-tale bridge often. If any trolls live beneath it, they don’t show themselves.

In fact, the retreat experience is entirely troll-free—important information for anyone considering attending. In residence this week are artists and musicians, journalists, editors, scientists, business people, and full-time writers. Their works in progress are just as varied, including YA fantasy, mystery, memoir, and literary fiction. As one stunningly good Lodge at Pine Cove meal follows another, we group and regroup, discussing our projects, making connections. I sense a collective willingness to reserve judgment. A generous impulse to support and encourage one another.

Writers at all stages are welcome here. Some attendees have published stories, articles, and books, while others are hoping to complete their first manuscript. No matter. Everyone has much to give and gain. The fabulous, attentive instructors set the tone: open, respectful, alert to meaning and context.

We gather in the lodge, a building at once a soaring modern gallery and warm home base, with massive stone hearths and wooden beams, wrap-around verandah, intimate library, and loads of windows. Outside, kayaks and canoes await paddlers who might set off in any direction, as water surrounds the place. While hiking trails and a boat tour tempt us away, a good portion of our week is spent in the lodge, learning.

The fiction and memoir instructors—Don Gillmor, Oakland Ross, and Susan Scott–guide small groups through discussions and exercises; deliver entertaining and informative craft talks; and provide thoughtful critiques that take account of each writer’s intentions. Poet Nanci White gives a spirited workshop, saying so many captivating things about poetry in quick succession that I come away with eight pages of notes, double-sided. Lindy Mechefske’s workshop illuminates the world of food writing, which has seen exploding interest among readers. Food is sustenance, but it’s also love, science, culture, and industry, with distinct angles of approach. We have a chance to practice, drawing on food memories to generate stories. A panel discussion on publishing yields wide-ranging, sometimes cautionary, anecdotes. Along with the other authors, Nicola Ross and Kristen Ciccarelli contribute fascinating tales about their book-publishing journeys. On the final evening, a student reading creates an opportunity to share, and to celebrate our work.

Pine Cove By Night. Photo by Rob Stimpson

Walking back to my cottage that last night, stopping on the dark bridge, I feel disembodied, a speck in the vast star-scape that shines overhead and below, mirrored in the water. It’s a bit dizzying, until I realize that this is precisely the aspect I try to cultivate on the page—invisibility. If only I can disappear into the text, erasing my tracks, the right words might shine through. And more: how lucky I am to stand here and connect the stars. My solitary cottage in the trees beckons, and I walk the path once more.

A moment lingers. Susan Scott’s talk, Truth-Telling 2.0: Writing in an Age of Exposure, addressed the topic of writing spaces, among many others. “Where do you write?” Susan asked. Some said offices—their own or borrowed—while others worked in cafes, on trains and in airports. Then a woman piped up from the back. “I have a writing cabin in the woods,” she said, and the whole room exhaled: Ahhh. We all want a writing cabin in the woods, it seems, and for the duration of the Write on the French River retreat, we have exactly that.

Read more

  • Laura Rock
  • Writer Resources
  • Writing on the French River

The Gift of Time

The silence was a gift. So, too, was the view from our kitchen window at the cabin. The smell of pine I haven’t experienced in years hit me as soon as I stepped out of the car. The discovery of fiddleheads on the five kilometre walk with my cabin mate Lindy Mechefske one morning. Late night chats with Lindy and my other cabin mate Susan Scott. Did I mention the king size bed, the croissants and other accoutrements delivered to our door each morning? This was my five days at the Lodge at Pine Cove on the French River, a writing retreat that reminded me how much I needed this gift of time.

Our exquisite three-bedroom cabin at the back end of a cluster of cabins, where we sat in the screened porch the first night, then a few days later when the weather turned, huddled around the wood stove. Sharing a cabin was a gift as well. I resisted at first, my shy self worried about having to be too social. But, what was I thinking? This was the land of introverts—respectful distance and meaningful conversations is our stock in trade.

View of the Cabin from Outside
View of the Cabin from outside: Photo by Pamela Mulloy

 

I haven’t even mentioned the writing yet have I? That’s because before I could get started I needed a clearing or filtering of all that I’d brought with me from work or home. I needed a clean sweep of the clutter before I could settle into the writing. It was the sensory balm that was the entry point into my writing self. The luxury of nature, and blissful silence that might be interrupted by birdsong or the wind soughing through the trees, or the rain that ran like marbles on the roof, that only served to underscore the full immersion needed to get to that empty space.  I had entered a world where isolation was mixed with just the right amount of social interaction.

Let me talk about the company I kept. Dinner was served in the lodge in an arrangement of tables of four, which, it turns out is just the right number for a group conversation. Each night I met with a new combination of writers. The conversation was also a gift. Imagine a dinner party where you can speak about authenticity of character, the emergence of nature writing, the ease or challenge of plot, and on and on and on. These were interesting people, and their own stories, in some cases the ones that mirrored their life, were coloured with pain, desire, success, a sense of activism.

I could talk about the instructors—clever, kind, always available, and the lodge itself which had that “lodge” feel, complete with stone fireplaces—and yes they were in use as it was a cold and wet week, the wonderfully accommodating and collegial staff. But it was the sense of being part of something that was the truly surprising gift here. Even working on our own there was a sense of a collective, creative impulse. The permission to speak, think about and finally wrestle with language.

The library in the lodge: Photo by Pamela Mulloy
The library in the lodge: Photo by Pamela Mulloy

 

So, the writing. I had something very specific I wanted to work on, a problem let’s say, that required pencil and paper, but also time to think. That came early each morning, later in the afternoon, and again later in the evening. In between those times were long walks, sessions with the instructors, and of course, food. By the end of my stay I had worked out the “problem” and forged ahead into places I hadn’t expected. That too, was a gift. A chance to limber up and stretch my writing side.

When it came time to think about returning home, we promised ourselves that we would carve out the time in our regular lives, we would push our projects forward, we would maintain this sizzling urge to keep writing because, really, it is life-giving, or sanity-making, or calming, or enlightening, or whatever fundamental attribute we assign it. I think we all realized that the retreat itself was a gift. A gift we give to ourselves. And one we should give more often.

And laughter, did I mention laughing my way into tears one night…


For more information on the Lodge at Pine Cove Creative Writing Retreat, check out their website here.

Read more

  • Pamela Mulloy
  • Writer Resources
  • Writing on the French River

Implicated: In Conversation with Caterina Edwards

TNQ’s annual personal essay contest attracts musings on every imaginable topic. (The sheer range—from mermaids to dimmer knobs—restores my faith in human nature.) But what we’re looking for in these entries is the deft weave of language, a writerly exploration of a subject that’s personal, engaged. We are looking for ideas, and for heart. That harmonious balance is embodied in the work of Edmonton writer, Caterina Edwards. 

—Susan Scott

I love the line on your website: “I have been in the same house for 26 years and with the same husband even longer. And I’m still obsessed with multiple selves and cultures, with private memory and public history, with here and there.” Your essay, “Light and Space on the Piazza,” redirects attention away from the home sphere, towards public history. Why illegal immigrants, what drew you to the subject?

Caterina Edwards

The Moldovan women first caught my attention because they looked out of place in Venice. I wrote an essay a few years ago called “Where the Heart is” on both my belonging and not belonging to that special city. Once the women began talking to me, I discovered their situation connected to several of my ongoing preoccupations: migrancy, caregiving, and the idea of the city. These women were in a precarious position: if they came to the attention of the authorities, they’d be deported. Most Italians tended to view them as a necessary evil: who else was going to care for the old and the sick.  The locals mostly acted as if they weren’t there. But the Moldovans dared to make themselves visible. For a couple of hours a day, they took over that piazza. Their resistance to being shut out aroused my curiosity and respect. I literally pushed my way into their circle.

You are primarily a fiction writer and towards the end of the essay we sense a storyline taking shape in your mind’s eye. Yet, ultimately, the form you chose for exploring the women’s plight was the personal essay. It’s a genre that TNQ adores. Please, say more about why you chose this genre.

I share your passion for the personal essay; it is the perfect genre to illuminate the private and the public and the links between the two. A few years ago I realized that the work that spoke to me the most was almost always creative non-fiction. And in my fiction, I tended to shoehorn in history, criticism, quotes, and reflection, which sometimes interfered with the core narrative.  My last book, Finding Rosa, was a work of creative non-fiction, because the subject demanded it. Writing it, I learned non-fiction requires just as much imagination as a novel, though in structure and choice rather than plot or character. An essay can be more difficult to do well than a short story; at least it is for me. In “Light and Space in the Piazza,” I included some facts and figures about Moldova in order to give a context to what the women said and to underline the desperation that made them leave their families, especially their children, behind. That kind of information can be boring or jarring. I worked to keep a consistent tone and a smooth narrative.

Switching genres is unwise if you want to establish yourself as a brand, which I’m told a writer should do. I love the challenge of exploring different genres. My previous books include a novel, a play, two novellas, and a collection of short stories. I have also written a radio drama for CBC, while the book I recently finished uses the mystery form. I’m also about to try collaborating on a screenplay.

I did feel my most vulnerable when Finding Rosa was published. I was not only exposing myself and my family to readers, I was questioning the accepted version of historical events during and after the Second World War in the former Yugoslavia. But the risk more than paid off. The response has been the most positive and emotional I have ever received.

You describe yourself as growing up with one language at home, and another “outside.” This split must have had a profound influence on your sense of authenticity, your attentiveness to voice. Are you concerned that by trying to give “voice to the voiceless,” you may be venturing into the thorny territory of appropriation?

I believe a writer can try to give voice to anyone or anything she wants, but whether it will be authentic or not is a different question. I am often irritated by the stereotyped presentation of Italian characters. Maybe that was one of the reasons I didn’t write a short story: I wasn’t sure I could do justice to the point-of-view of a twenty-first century Moldovan illegal immigrant. Simply transcribing their words or taking the role of the objective observer also felt wrong, almost voyeuristic. It had to be a personal essay: I was implicated. For four years, I had cared for my mother who suffered from dementia. (That trial by fire is the basis of Finding Rosa.) Hiring a full-time, cheap—affordable—immigrant worker, even if she were illegal, would have been so convenient. But I also felt a link to their position: my mother and her siblings had been refugees, poorly paid and exploited.

The cat’s out of the bag with non-fiction, isn’t it? Real-life characters often chafe at how they are described by the author. Your essay exposes unflattering prejudices held by some members of your own family. Were you reticent about doing so? Take us through your thought process here.

Luckily, my cousins don’t speak or read English. Besides, they wouldn’t hide their racist attitudes, which are common in Northeastern Italy and often expressed in the media. Italy is crashing and burning. In such times, those perceived as “other” are targets. So, I had no second thoughts about “outing” family members in this essay. I am concerned about Finding Rosa coming out in Italy next year. I questioned myself while writing it. A reader can tell if a memoirist is writing out of spite and revenge. It is detectable in the prose, as is dishonesty. So I relied on clarity, accuracy, a moderate ruthlessness, and an open heart.

With life writing, often the people you think might be hurt or angry aren’t the ones who complain. In Finding Rosa I inadvertently exposed a family secret—and was thanked for doing so. Meanwhile, a long-ago ex-boyfriend took issue with a couple of inoffensive lines.

There’s a growing body of critical reception to your work. Where would you place this essay in relation to your writing as a whole? Does it have a certain pride of place now that it joins a distinguished list of Personal Essay contest winners?

I am so pleased the essay won. I didn’t know where to send it. I entered not thinking it would win but it might get chosen for publication. More than anything else I have ever worked on, I felt it was my duty to write this essay. I had to get it published for them, for the women who had trusted me. Winning the Edna means more attention and, I hope, more understanding of the experiences of one group of illegal immigrants. Winning has also encouraged me to start another personal essay. Maybe I shouldn’t think of myself as primarily a writer of fiction.

In “Light and Space in the Piazza” I look at how various illegal immigrants inhabit the space of the city. That the city is Venice connects this piece to the rest of my writing. I find Venice a useful microcosm for examining such world-wide ills as pollution, immigration, the growing gap between the rich and the poor, and more, especially since the city is so often portrayed through a romantic haze.

Read more

  • Caterina Edwards
  • Susan Scott
  • The Edna Staebler Personal Essay Contest
  • Writer Resources

“Latencies”: An Interview with Emily McKibbon

Emily McKibbon won TNQ’s 2014 Edna Staebler Personal Essay Contest with a piece at once delicate, reflective, trenchant. “Latencies” begins with the author looking at a photograph. What is missing from that photograph triggers questions about image and ephemera, erasure and memory—how to love when what is loved goes missing?

The 2014 PE Contest introduced us to Emily, then a student of Ayelet Tsabari’s, and to her CNF writing group—a group of emerging writers that has since become important to TNQ for other reasons (see The Back Story series on our blog).

This is we what we do: lean in, and listen.

Please join us. Read Emily’s essay here, or in TNQ #132: What Comes to the Surface.

—Susan Scott

 

Emily, the last we spoke about “Latencies” was the following spring, at the 2015 National Magazine Awards gala in downtown Toronto. You were shortlisted for the prestigious Best New Magazine Writer Award, and your TNQ essay was posted on the NMA website. A lot has happened since then, including the release of this essay in the fall of 2016 as a gorgeous chapbook designed by Karen Schindler (Notes on Photographs, Baseline Press). This one piece has taken you so far—what would you like to say about that journey?

Almost three years out from writing this essay, I can say that this journey has been transformative. From when I heard about winning the Edna Staebler Personal Essay Contest, everything has just felt lucky and unlikely—the TNQ award, the National Magazine Awards, everything. Karen Schindler of Baseline Press contacted me after reading “Latencies” in TNQ, and she was also extraordinarily patient with my rookie fumbling. And she made this beautiful chapbook, with her hands. How many things are lovingly handmade these days? So much care and attention has gone into this one work—my writing group’s, Ayelet’s, yours, Pamela’s, Karen’s, the juries of the Edna Staebler PE Contest and the National Magazine Awards. How can I be anything other than completely humbled? Writing might be necessary, but everything else is a privilege.

I don’t have it in me to be articulate about this, yet, just grateful.

Let’s talk about the back story: where the essay began, why, or how, the narrative threads and concentrated actions around photographs drew you to the essay form rather than, say, poetry or fiction.

Sisters sharing a casket, ca. 1865
Sisters sharing a casket, ca. 1865 Albumen print

“Latencies” began as a class assignment for Ayelet Tsabari’s introduction to creative non-fiction at the School for Continuing Studies at the University of Toronto. I hadn’t thought to tell this story—I was writing an essay comparing my regional curatorial practice to grassroots wrestling—but it was February and I didn’t want to do the legwork for the wrestling piece. “Latencies” became an essay by necessity, but the format allowed me to process some things I had been thinking about for a while and make sense of them in a way that felt balanced. I needed ample freedom to reflect, which is what the personal essay does really well.

I like essays because they allow the writer to be really scenic, emotional, vulnerable, funny, and analytical within a pretty tight frame. There’s a whole section in “Latencies” which is pure supposition—about the photographer taking the portrait I later encountered—I’ve gone back and forth on this. Was that a rookie mistake? If yes, I hope I make more of them. I love that weird little unself-conscious aside.

Essays have this reputation for being stringently styled and highly polished, but they’re unruly little beasties. I think poets have more fun than essayists, but essayists can just go raw and real, really get their messy guts out. If I finish an essay feeling sick with terror but also wildly triumphant, that’s my sweet spot.

Tell us how you came to writing, and to the essay genre, in particular. Are there essayists you admire? Is there anyone in particular whom you look to for guidance, inspiration?

I’ve always loved essayists. My father used to read Annie Dillard, and when I was in high school I stole her books from him. I was reading David Sedaris and David Rakoff at the time, and then I found Rebecca Solnit and Joan Didion. And in grad school, I read endless Susan Sontag. Now I can’t go a day without Maggie Nelson. I’m just reading Chris Kraus’ I Love Dick for the first time, and a minute apart from it feels like a minute wasted.

My relationship to writing is convoluted. I spent a long time writing secretly—fake missed connections on Craigslist and exhaustive penpalling—but after graduate school and a few years working as a curator, my writing was awful, stiff, and formal. I enrolled in Ayelet’s writing class to unstick myself, and my life has completely changed. It all feels a bit charmed, until I remember all those harmful years of silencing.

(For a better description of this, see Claire Vaye Watkin’s “On Pandering,” with a particular emphasis on the heartbreaking section: Watching Boys Do Stuff)

I’m still kind of writing secretly. It’s taken years to sort out how my writing life and curatorial practice intersect. Writers like Chris Kraus, Maggie Nelson and Hilton Als have opened up a critical space to examine emotion and vulnerability, and now I’m opening up to my colleagues and mentors about this part of my life. It’s an incomplete project, but I finally feel like I can justify my deep emotional response to art and visual culture as a rigorous but parallel connoisseurship. And that comes from writing, and from the wide reading that writing requires. 

What drew you to The New Quarterly as a potential home for this particular work?

Ayelet recommended a couple of places to submit “Latencies.” I chose The New Quarterly because it felt right—in the very first sentence of your mandate, you state that you nurture emerging writers alongside well-established writers, and that was important. It was really nerve-wracking sending something in, but there was something about this contest (and the spirit of Edna Staebler) that was welcoming. “Latencies” has never been a comfortable piece for me, but working with everyone at TNQ has been so easy. I very quickly learned that TNQ is the centre of a wonderful community, and one that has been very welcoming to me and some of my other emerging writer friends.

Once the essay became “award-winning,” did your relationship to it change in any way? I’m interested in the enduring power of a work—not only how it resonates with readers but how it still informs the writer, has a hold on the creator’s own imagination.

Unidentified photographer Deceased child held by excised woman, ca. 1850 Daguerreotype
Unidentified photographer
Deceased child held by excised woman, ca. 1850
Daguerreotype

Winning that award really froze that piece in time. Everything I write I feel I could revise at any time—this piece, it’s done. It’s not what I would write now, but it’s done. I’m surprised by it, still. For my chapbook, I wrote a companion piece, also about photography. I haven’t finished writing about photography, not even remotely.

One of the really wonderful things about the past couple of years has been listening to other writers talk about their non-fiction work. An essay is never just an essay, award-winning or not, and as a writer you have to live with its repercussions. “Latencies” is about grief, but the grief isn’t really mine: I’ve put a person I care deeply about under a microscope, capturing him at his most vulnerable moments. Of the two versions that exist of this time of his life, his and mine, only mine has won an award. I’m not sure how I’d feel if the reverse were true. Non-fiction is really, really fraught, and the degree of honesty a good essay requires will complicate any relationship. My reading of creative non-fiction is inflected by this knowledge, and that makes the genre richer. Richer and riskier.

Edna Staebler, our intrepid benefactor after whom the eponymous contest was named, was determined to see Canadian writers supported. Can we tell Edna’s ghost what you did with the prize money? Was it earmarked for something special?

I was definitely supported, both body and soul. I bought a new pair of blue jeans and enrolled in Ayelet Tsabari’s follow-up class, Creative Non-fiction II. Can class and clothing schmeck? I’d like to think so.

All images are from the Walter Johnson Collection of the George Eastman Museum, and are used with their kind permission. 

Read more

  • Emily McKibbon
  • Susan Scott
  • The Edna Staebler Personal Essay Contest
  • Writer Resources

“True Detective”: An Interview With Elana Wolff

Often, when people ask about the winners of our Edna Staebler Personal Essay Contest, I describe the first-place essays as a gift. I say this less because our eclectic judges see the winners as stand-outs and more because of what such works embody—a voice, a drive, an excursion to a place we think we know. Or an introduction to a place apart, a world that few have savoured. Such was the case with our 2015 winner, “Paging Kafka’s Elegist,” by Elana Wolff, which appeared in TNQ #136: Do You Know Who I Am?

The selection of Wolff’s essay came on the heels of lively rounds of reading and re-reading, followed by a heart-stopping process of elimination. As with all TNQ contests, the essays were judged blind. No judge knew the identities of submitting authors. Judging blind allows us to attend to what’s on the page, rather than be swayed by sentiment (the wish to reward familiar authors). Judging blind is freeing to an enterprise like TNQ, which is built on relationships—new and old, emerging and long-standing. The freedom to be surprised is the freedom to discover. And discovery, it turns out, is the genius of Elana Wolff. Read why, in my conversation with her, conducted in the fall of 2015.

—Susan Scott

Once our judges choose the winning essay, we immediately want to know the backstory—the essayist’s journey, how and why her ideas took the shape they did. Tell us how this piece began, why or how the complex story that informs this work assumed the shape of an essay rather than, say, that of a suite of poems.

The essay started percolating in January of 2015, as a continuation of the Kafka-Langer project and the quest for “Kafka’s Elegist” Georg Mordechai Langer. My husband David (I’m sticking to the pseudonym here) and I were again visiting in Tel Aviv, staying with cousins. We had the address of the apartment where Langer had lived the last years of his life—till his death in March, 1943. No. 8 Halperin. I’d found Halperin Street on Google Maps. It’s a short street close to the hotel strip on the beach, about a ten-minute walk from our cousins’ apartment. The Google Earth view shows No. 8 to be a newer apartment—not a crumbling vintage edifice like most of the others on the street. We were up early the day after we arrived. Of course the first thing I wanted to do was walk over to Halperin. I was disappointed to see the charmless 1990s-looking block that is No. 8. I photographed it anyway, along with some of the original buildings on the street, as part of my ongoing documentation.

While in Israel I received an email from our publisher announcing that our two-in-one flip-side book, launched in the fall of 2014, was scheduled for a second printing. We were thrilled. There were corrections to be made, and I briefly considered rewriting my Introduction, then decided against it. But there was more to say—new things, reflections, and I wanted to tell the quasi-comical story of the visits to Langer’s grave at the Nachalat Yitzchak Cemetery. I felt Langer tapping at my back, as it were, asking me to write.

Why an essay, as opposed to poetry or fiction? I’m looking at the lives and work of real people, seeking to assemble a true picture of what was and what happened from pieces of extant yet disparate, sometimes obscured, writing. A poem, even a suite of poems, could not contain the investigative threads. And investigation is not the work of poetry, nor is it the work of fiction. Fiction is fabrication. It describes imaginary events and people. My focus here is real people and “true detective” work.

Actually, though, a number of readers have suggested that I write a film-script, and elaborate in the gaps. One reader even envisioned a cast of actors: Rupert Friend (of Homeland fame) as Kafka. Dan Stevens (the Matthew Crawley character in Downton Abbey) with a beard, as Langer. Tom Cruise in the role of David (my husband got a kick out of that), and either Julia Roberts or Catriona Balfe (heroine in the Outlander series) as me—mostly because Roberts and Balfe are tall women, as am I, and Tom Cruise, like David, is not as tall. It’s silliness. But you have to laugh.

How did you come to writing in general and to the personal essay in particular? What attracts you to the form? Are there essayists whom you admire, look to for guidance, or for inspiration?

I’ve been a word-person since early childhood, writing tales and plays almost from the time I could read. Not long ago I came across an assignment from grade two that my mother had packed away in a trunk. I write in thin neat upright letters that I want to be an artist and a teacher when I grow up. Children often have a clear image of self and mission—before they get worn by the world and have to retrieve themselves in later phases. I never lost my interest in language and tongues growing up, but life led me on a circuitous route and I didn’t take up writing creative non-fiction till quite recently—by way of poetry and art.

I’m attracted to the critical aspect of the essay—the working-out of ideas and beliefs, the clear  presentation of compelling subjects. There are so many fine examples of essay-writing. Today  I’ll include on my short list: essays of Anne Carson, Walter Benjamin, Clive James, David Foster Wallace, Orhan Pamuk, Roberto Bolaño, Owen Barfield, Wallace Stevens. Charles Simic’s three collections: Orphan Factory, The Unemployed Fortune-Teller, and Wonderful Words, Silent Truths have a permanently prominent spot on my shelf, as does Louise Glück’s Proofs and Theories. Glück’s spare, elegant prose is as matchless as her poetry, and her insights on courage, sincerity, and “the unsaid” have been beacons for me.

On a shelf of its own stands the writing of W.G. Sebald, works that straddle the boundary between fact and fiction: Vertigo, The Emigrants, The Rings of Saturn, A Place in the Country, On the Natural History of Destruction. Sebald himself called his writing “documentary fiction” and “prose narrative.” It also reads as memoir, history, travelogue, and literary tribute. His main themes are memory, destruction, the uncanny, synchronicity. His writing is responsible, restrained. Chaste. I love it. I recently read the whole of Vertigo aloud to my mother during a road trip. (She was driving, I was in the passenger seat.) When I finished, I began again.

What drew you to The New Quarterly as a potential home for the Langer essay?

I started writing the essay soon after returning from Israel in January. I titled it “Paging Kafka’s Elegist” from the start—wrote and revised, wrote and revised for about two weeks straight. My sleep was interrupted and I knew I couldn’t keep up the obsessive pace for long. When I finished, I read the piece aloud to my husband. He laughed at the parts about the cemetery custodian.

Soon after, I received an email announcing The New Quarterly’s upcoming contests, among them The Edna Staebler Personal Essay Contest. I’d just completed the essay and hadn’t thought about where I might submit it. I perused the Edna Staebler Contest guidelines: the essay could be of any length. That worked for me, as my piece is quite long—about 7,000 words. The judging would be blind and any identifying names had to be changed. I could do that. I went back to the work, made the adjustments, and posted a hard copy on March 18th.

A week later I received an email saying that my submission had been received and that I should submit an electronic copy as well. I checked the essay again, found and corrected a typo, and submitted an e-copy on March 25, 2015. A little shiver went through me as I registered the date. On March 25, 1915—exactly 100 years earlier—Franz Kafka met and first mentioned in his diary Georg Langer: “the western Jew who assimilated to the Hasidim.”

Now that “Paging Kafka’s Elegist” is a prize-winning essay, has your relationship to it changed in any way? I’m interested in the enduring power of a work—not only how or why it resonates with readers but how it continues to inform the writer. Your work has made its mark on me, as on our many readers. What is its hold on your imagination?

Langer's Grave: photo by Elana Wolff

I’ve spoken in the essay and elsewhere of Kafka’s enduring hold on me. I also wrote three other prose pieces on Kafka this past year. The first one, titled “Kafka’s Death House,” traces a trip my husband and I made to the town of Kierling on the northern outskirts of Vienna where Kafka spent the last months of his life at the Hoffmann Sanatorium—now an apartment house containing a Kafka Memorial Room. That piece is published in the Tel Aviv-based site, The Writer’s Drawer, and features photos and a slide-show beautifully presented by editor Beryl Belsky.

I also wrote a short piece titled “Trying to Find the Man in the Hat” for the UK-based online project Placing the Author: Literary Tourism in the Long Nineteenth Century. In this piece I root Kafka in the “Long Nineteenth Century,” though he’s also one of the 20th century’s darkest brightest lights. This piece features a photo of me in Prague standing beside Czech sculptor Jaroslav Róna’s huge bronze statue of an empty suit, the Kafka character riding on its shoulders. The statue alludes to the early story “Description of a Struggle” in which Kafka sets down themes he would revisit in his later fiction and “private” writing.

And I contributed to Brick Books’s 40th Anniversary Celebration of Canadian Poetry a long article on two of Anne Carson’s Kafka-focused Short Talks. I’m not finished with Kafka, that’s for sure. Not with Langer either.

Edna Staebler, our intrepid benefactor after whom the Personal Essay Contest was named, was determined to see Canadian writers supported, body and soul. Can we tell Edna’s ghost what plans, if any, you have for your prize money?

We can tell Edna’s ghost that the prize money is going toward a trip to Prague this November. David and I will be staying in the building that housed the Worker’s Accident Insurance Institute, where Kafka served for most his working life as an insurance adjuster. The building is now a hotel, and we’ve booked the room that was once Kafka’s office. We’ll revisit the places of Kafka’s birth and schooling, the various residences, and this time also his grave in the New Jewish Cemetery in the suburb of Prague-Žižkov—close to where Kafka and Langer first met on a Sabbath afternoon.

Kafka Memorial Room KierlingWe’re also planning a side-trip to the village of Siřem (formerly Zürau) west of the capital— where Kafka stayed with his youngest sister Ottla in the fall of 1917. Ottla was tending to their brother-in-law’s farm and to her belovèd brother who had just been diagnosed with tuberculosis. From Siřem we’ll proceed west to the spa-town of Mariánské Lázne, formerly Marienbad, where in 1916 Kafka spent ten days at the Schloss Balmoral Hotel with his fiancée Félice Bauer. Langer happened to be in Marienbad at the same time, and the two friends met up for long evening walks to the Ambrosius Spring. The Schloss Balmoral, it seems, is no longer extant—at least I haven’t been able to find it on the Internet. We’ll inquire in Prague and make our side-trip arrangements there. The prize money is going toward new research, hopefully more writing.

Thank you, Edna, for your support. Thank you also to the judges for recognizing this work. I’m deeply grateful.

Photos provided by Elana Wolff

Read more

  • Elana Wolff
  • Susan Scott
  • The Edna Staebler Personal Essay Contest
  • Writer Resources

“It Not Only Rises, It Shines”: An Interview with Julie Paul

TNQ’s 2016 Edna Staebler Personal Essay Contest winner, by Victoria writer Julie Paul, is a bold, loving foray into complex familial and cultural territory.

We had the pleasure of introducing Julie at the opening of the 2016 Wild Writers Festival, where she read from her essay.

You can read it here, and in TNQ #140: In Appreciation of Our Spots.

—Susan Scott 


Julie PaulJulie, tell us about the backstory—where and how this piece began; how did the complexities behind this work assume the form of an essay rather than, say, that of poetry or fiction?

I have early versions of this essay saved as “I See You,” alongside a file called “Hair Products,” in which my daughter and I listed the varieties of hair products she’s used over the years. It’s a long list. But I think the notion of seeing someone for who they truly are—the beauty and the challenge of that—is where this essay began. Whether this is actually possible is something I’ll perhaps explore in a future essay.

But when it began? Family Day, February 2016. Largely due to Beyoncé.

The beauty of CNF is that it can hold anything; it’s truly the wild west, the galaxy, the biggest Tupperware container in the world. The sub-genre of personal essay is one of my favourite forms, since it’s up close and well, personal, and the fluidity of the form lends itself very well to exploring a number of ideas and questions. This particular essay of mine goes off in a few directions before returning to home base.

I knew I couldn’t limit these ideas to a single poem, even a long one. And I didn’t feel compelled to write fiction, either, but the themes might resurface at some point; in fact, I’m writing a novel now in which the main character, white, marries a black spouse. But theme never works well for me as a starting point for fiction—not on a conscious level, at least. When I try this, my work always ends up clunky, obvious, didactic.

How did you come to writing, and what attracts you to essays? Are there essayists you look to for guidance or inspiration?

I like to say that winning a Royal Canadian Legion Remembrance Day poetry contest got me started down this writing road, way back when I was twelve. I attribute it in part to that feeling I got when I made a woman in the audience cry, after I read my poem about sons not coming home from war. This was my first real taste of the influence words can have—my words. I was already an avid reader, and I lived for the weekly class spelling bees. Growing up Catholic, I was also reminded, after Bible readings, that This is the Word of the Lord. Words equal power. (Another essay about shedding Catholic guilt is in the works).

I moved on to writing back-seat-of-the-bus poetry as a teenager, the kind that holds your angst and hormones, and reading my uncle’s Queen’s University textbooks, notably 20th Century Poetry and Poetics, all the while listening to the lyrics of U2, The Smiths, etc. and reading Alice Munro and Mavis Gallant. CanLit and English classes in Grade Thirteen were pivotal for me, too—and teachers who encouraged the love of words to continue, who introduced me to fine literature, both classic and contemporary. I remember dressing completely in black and lighting candles in a classroom for a presentation on Canadian poets: I chose Joy Kogawa and Margaret Atwood. Oh, the drama!

As far as inspiring essayists go, a few come to mind: Brian Doyle, who writes with such intimacy about his son’s heart, and other hearts, and other topics dear to him. Susan Olding, who explores her own life on the page with honesty and insight that inspires. David Sedaris, for his crazy humour and once again, his willingness to put himself in writing. The Best American Essays series. Phillip Lopate.

One source of essays that I love to share with everyone I know or teach is The Sun magazine, out of North Carolina. From the time I was a teenager and reading this mag in the health food store where I worked, its mix of personal essays, fiction, interviews, and poetry has informed my reading, and thus, my life. Come to think of it, I know another fine Canadian magazine that sounds an awful lot like this…

We’re pleased that you saw The New Quarterly as a potential home for this piece. Please, say more.

flick-a-da-wrist: photo by Julie Paul

I’ve always been a huge fan of The New Quarterly, truly, long before they gave me $1,000! It seems to be one of the most interesting journals in Canada—and beyond. My story “Black Forest” was featured on the TNQ blog years ago, and then, as with this essay, and even through a few rejections, the people at TNQ have been supportive and generous to work with. I highly recommend submitting to this magazine.

I thought my essay might also find a home with TNQ because of the contest description: essays in which the writer is the so-called expert: “in which the writer’s personal engagement with the topic provides the frame or through-line.” I like that word, “engagement.” It speaks to what the form can do.

I tried TNQ, too, because it honours the personal essay form in a way that other contests and calls don’t seem to do. And not having a limiting word count really works well for me. It allowed the piece to simply be as long as it needed to be.

Now that “It Not Only Rises, It Shines” is a prize-winning essay, how has your relationship to it changed? I’m interested in the enduring power of a work—how it resonates with readers, yes, but also how it shapes the writer, has a hold on the creator’s imagination.

Avery on a beach: photo by Julie Paul

A few readers have asked me what my daughter thinks of this essay. Because of the intimate nature of this work, I read it aloud to her before sending it, to get her okay. A little eye-rolling may have been included in her response: “Oh, there’s Mom, doing that thing she does…” But she gave me the thumbs up.

Then, when the essay was accepted, I got nervous; essays are more real than fiction, the genre I most often publish. You can’t seek refuge in made-up lands, pretend people, can’t say Oh, that’s all just nonsense.

Oddly, this wasn’t an essay that saw many eyes before I submitted it. Although I belong to two stellar writing groups, this is a recent work that didn’t make it to them, so its only readers besides my husband and daughter were the TNQ team. That’s not the norm for me! Which only makes having it in print a little more daunting.

Now that it’s in print, do I feel any different? I’ve begun to get some positive feedback about it, and reading at the Wild Writers Festival recently was hugely confirming: people seemed to appreciate it. I received some lovely comments.

But still, I worry. That I’ve portrayed myself as an expert in having a biracial child—although I really tried to push home the polar opposite of that. That I’ve offended. I worry that I’ve completely overlooked a huge idea / concept / situation. But the work is out there now, and like I’m learning to do with my daughter, I need it to have a life of its own. As the Vicomte de Valmont repeats in Dangerous Liaisons, “It’s beyond my control.”

I think I will write more on this theme; in fact, since I wrote this essay I’ve put up a short Facebook piece about Beyoncé and parenting, after my girl gave me her album Lemonade for Mother’s Day. (Really, check it out: the visual album includes poems by Warsan Shire between each video. It’s powerful, important work.) Poems are also likely brewing.

The personal essay form has this amazing unifying ability; it’s like an offering, a hand reaching out in a gesture of connection.

The US election results are just in. Oh, boy. I don’t know of a better thing for people to do than to reach out and tell their stories, their truths, their hopes and fears. Writing CNF, in particular, personal essays, is one way to do this.

Will my essay have an impact? I don’t know. But perhaps it will encourage others to share their own experiences, fears, questions, and allow their voices to be heard. I believe, more than ever, that this is what we need.

Edna Staebler, for whom the eponymous contest was named, was determined to see writers supported. Can we tell Edna’s ghost what plans, if any, you might have for your prize money?

Oh, Edna / Edna’s ghost, I thank you so kindly for your generosity, and I would love to have a cup of tea with you sometime…

There are so many ways to spend such a prize, but fittingly, most of it will go to my daughter’s braces and driving lessons and perhaps some hair products. I might be able to squeeze out a few writing days on a gulf island this winter, too. I am so grateful.

photos provided by Julie Paul

Read more

  • Julie Paul
  • Susan Scott
  • The Edna Staebler Personal Essay Contest
  • Writer Resources

Recent Posts

  • Four TNQ Pieces to be Published in 2026 Best Canadian Anthology Series
  • TNQ is a Top Nominee at The 2025 National Magazine Awards
  • Alena Papayanis’ Writing Space
  • Finding the Form with Bobbie Jean Huff
  • What’s Christina Wells Reading?

Recent Comments

  • Writing Spaces | Friday Fables on Writing Spaces: Catherine Austen
  • Fresh off the press: TNQ 147 | on Writing Spaces: Lamees Al Ethari
  • Sleeping with the Author | on Sleeping with the Author
  • October Wrap Up | CandidCeillie on Trans Girl in Love
  • Gushing Gratitude, Art & News – Sally Cooper on TNQ’s 2017 Edna Staebler Personal Essay Longlist

Archives

  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • February 2017
  • November 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • July 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • January 2014
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • November 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2010

Categories

  • Uncategorised

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Recent Posts

  • Four TNQ Pieces to be Published in 2026 Best Canadian Anthology Series
  • TNQ is a Top Nominee at The 2025 National Magazine Awards
  • Alena Papayanis’ Writing Space
  • Finding the Form with Bobbie Jean Huff
  • What’s Christina Wells Reading?
Facebook-f Instagram Linkedin-in Tiktok X-twitter
  • Privacy Policy
  • Accessibilty

MAGAZINE

  • About
  • Where to Buy

CONTRIBUTE

  • Submit
  • Volunteer
  • Our Board
  • Donate

CONNECT

  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter

Subscribe to our Newsletter

CONNECT